Fine Art PhotographyStock PhotographyVintage

Ginger Snaps

History has been rough on redheads. We no longer burn them as witches or accuse them of being vampires, but some mythical baggage remains. Fiery temper? Sickly? Just plain unlucky? Gingers have heard it all.

SuperStock_866-5816Image Number: 866-5816

Artists, however, have always found inspiration in red tresses. The Pre-Raphaelites preferred redheads in their dreamlike paintings. One 16thcentury Venetian master was so enthralled with strawberry blonde hair that we still refer to the shade as “Titian.”

SuperStock_866-14536Image number: 866-14536

Van Gogh was a natural when it came to appreciating redheads. He only had to look in a mirror – or a self-portrait. He painted at least 30 “selfies” – from realistic representations to the more painterly vivid impasto style.

SuperStock_475-808Image number: 475-808

Royalty provided a boost to redhead pride. Portraits of Henry VIII and his daughter, the long-reigning Elizabeth, are among the most recognizable. Centuries later, as Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor makes his debut on the world stage, one of the first questions from royal baby-watchers was:  Does he have father Harry’s red hair?

SuperStock_761-142641Image number: 761-142641

Of course, today’s red hair is no longer strictly genetic. Some of our favorite redheads, from Lucille Ball to ferocious Sansa Stark (Sophie Turner) are bottle-bred reds. They get the great look but not one of the natural advantages that come with the real thing: redheads don’t go grey. Their pigment fades with age to an eventual silvery-white.

SuperStock_866-14915Image number: 866-14915


Tom Sheeter
Tom Sheeter is a Los Angeles based writer and Account Manager at Superstock. He specializes in film and tv licensing and clearance issues.

    Comments are closed.

    0 %